Chapter 4: Recommendations

4.1 Introduction
The following recommendations are a response to the analysis of the existing conditions of the study area. The policies and guidelines put forward attempt to resolve the opportunities, constraints and problem areas that were previously mentioned, in a manner that is both functionally and aesthetically appropriate for the University community.

Campus-wide Recommendations have been put forth to preserve, unify and enhance the campus environment. These recommendations do not apply to specific project sites, but rather, to the entire study area. These guidelines and policy statements address common situations and issues which affect all sectors of campus.

The Design Guidelines for Sectors of the Study Area are intended as more detailed overlays to the sectors identified in section 4.3 of Volume III of the Campus Master Plan: District Plan for the Academic Core North. In addition to these eighteen sectors are the North Residence Halls, the South Residence Halls and the Campus Edges. The foundation for these guidelines is established by the spatial hierarchy and circulation framework presented in Chapter 3 of this document.

It is the intent of these recommendations and design guidelines to direct project committees, design professionals and design review committees toward the landscape goals of the University. In addition to providing guidance for major building and open space projects, these standards will be the basis for the incremental restoration of existing campus open spaces. The consistent retrofitting of smaller site improvement projects will result in a more unified campus fabric over time.

The Campus-wide Recommendations of the Landscape Master Plan can be applied not only to the study area covered in this document, but to all districts of campus. However, district landscape master plans should be produced in the future to establish site specific design guidelines for those individual areas not covered in this document. In addition, other related subjects that require further study that are not included in the scope of the Landscape Master Plan are:

4.2 Campus-wide Recommendations

1. Site Improvement Review Procedures

Goals & Objectives
In order to ensure site improvements to the highest standards, it is recommended that a site improvement review process be established at The Ohio State University under the auspices of a Site Improvement Advisory Team. Major landscape projects at the University will be reviewed by the Design Review Board for conformance with policies, principles and guidelines of the Campus Master Plan. However, without some process for review, the accumulation of small improvement, replacement and repair projects can collectively degrade the campus environment. Therefore it is recommended that all site improvement projects not critiqued by the Design Review Board be reviewed by the Site Improvement Advisory Team regardless of their size. The Site Improvement Advisory Team also has the discretion to request Design Review Board review of any project which they believe has a significant impact on the campus as a whole. A site improvement project shall be defined as any project that adds to or changes the functional or visual qualities of the landscape. A maintenance repair project shall be defined as the upkeep of existing site elements to ensure their proper function and preserve their existing aesthetic qualities, such as the replacement of site elements with like materials in like form. Maintenance projects will not be subject to Site Improvement Review.

The charge to the Site Improvement Advisory Team is to review site improvement projects on behalf of the University with two primary goals:

  1. To interpret the Landscape Master Plan policies and design guidelines; to determine compliance with the policies, principles, and guidelines; to recommend modifications to the proposed project when appropriate. Serious deliberation should be given to any exceptions or to any modification of the policies, principles, or guidelines.
  2. To evaluate projects to ensure that they meet the highest qualitative standards. Special care must be taken, however, so that the Team does not lapse into "designing the site," and that architects, landscape architects, and other project representatives are given clear instruction after any review. Additionally, the Site Improvement Advisory Team will be responsible for maintaining and updating as appropriate the Technical Appendix to the Landscape Master Plan. This includes revisions to the standard details and outline specifications that might be necessary as a result of future site related issues and evolving construction technologies. The Team should also establish and maintain the policies and procedures by which the standards and specifications are enforced.

The Site Improvement Advisory Team’s review responsibility is the "civic" mission of a project, not its "private" or functional one. This includes review of the project in light of not only the Landscape Master Plan, but the Long Range Concept Plan and the relevant district plan, with emphasis on the quality of public open space and landscape, relationship to adjacent architecture and its relationship and contribution to the larger campus context in which it is sited.

Team Membership
The Site Improvement Advisory Team members are appointed by the Vice President of Business and Finance. The Site Improvement Advisory Team is advisory to the University Landscape Architect, who will chair the committee. Membership will consist of the University Landscape Architect, two representatives from Physical Facilities, two faculty members: one from the Section of Landscape Architecture; one from the Department of Horticulture and Crop Science that also represents the Chadwick Arboretum; two representatives from the Office of the University Architect and Physical Planning; one registered, experienced landscape architect from outside of The Ohio State University; and one student. In addition, the Team should notify other groups that may be affected by potential site improvements on an individual project review basis. The Team may also select other personnel to provide technical resource support as required. 

The Site Improvement Advisory Team is an advisory body-not an action body. This distinguishes the Site Improvement Advisory Team from any project-specific formal review and approval process. The Site Improvement Advisory Team reviews projects from the perspective of the larger context in which the project is located.

2. Assignment of Outdoor Space
While all outdoor spaces on campus are shared by the public, problems often arise from a lack of ownership and responsibility for the open spaces between buildings. Even when buildings have a strong relationship to their adjacent outdoor spaces, many of these spaces are neglected or misused during construction or renovation projects. In addition to the percentage of construction cost that has been established for civic structure improvements on all capital projects, a policy should be created which assigns responsibility for the design, construction, restoration and maintenance of all exterior space. In addition, offices and departments should be encouraged to participate in the improvement of the exterior spaces surrounding their respective buildings. They should be represented in the design process for new construction or renovation of their own sites as well as adjacent projects that may impact their site. They should also be encouraged to propose and request site improvements independent of construction projects.

3. Sustainability
A sustainable landscape minimizes resources and energy in an attempt to create a balance between the built environment and the natural cycles and processes of the site and region. The principles of sustainable design should also be applied to The Ohio State University’s landscape. The University is committed to improving the quality of life on campus well into the future and has a responsibility to educate the University community about the importance of sustainability and the environment. 

Sustainable design incorporates the use of economic, environmental and social measurements to evaluate a given design or activity:

To this end, the University should incorporate into its decision-making process policies for the planning, implementation and evaluation of sustainable criteria for project design and management operations in the University landscape. Examples might include:

4. Maintenance and Staffing
Life cycle costing is more commonly applied to buildings than to landscapes. While there is no such thing as a "no maintenance" landscape, durability and quality are key in reducing long-term maintenance and replacement requirements. The implementation of University-wide standards for landscape elements will help to provide a consistent level of quality and durable landscapes throughout the campus. For example, a short-term decision to avoid spending money on a new walk connection may lead to a more expensive treatment over time ­ with a less desirable aesthetic result. If walks, signs and bike racks are properly designed and located, for example, there will be no need to install elaborate plantings to divert pedestrian or bicycle traffic. 

During the design phases, each landscape construction project should be evaluated for consistency with University standards and for maintenance requirements. The staffing levels for the landscape maintenance department should be increased commensurate with new landscape maintenance requirements.

Typically, in a University campus setting, landscape maintenance requires one full-time employee per 20-25 acres. This assumes that horticultural workers who maintain plants and mow lawns during the warmer months can perform snow plowing and pruning and other winter-season chores. Staff training and continuing education are key in improving performance and retaining skilled maintenance staff.

The current method of establishing the landscape maintenance budget for the campus is directly related to building square footage. This formula has no relationship to the maintenance requirements of the campus landscape. The University should consider a system that is based on acreage of land and the maintenance requirements of individual spaces. This could be achieved by establishing a maintenance fund/endowment based on the capital cost of site improvement projects.

5. Snow Removal and Snow Melting Chemicals
The use of salt to melt snow and ice on pavements is damaging to vehicles, pavements (especially concrete), building entry floors, horticultural soils and plants. Its use should be limited to asphalt roadways wherever possible and applied after snow is removed. Salt should be mixed with a minimum of 1:1 sand to improve traction, and the amount of salt in the mix should be limited to the smallest amount possible. Maintenance crews should set baffles on spreaders to limit the spread of sand and salt mixtures. The use of straight sand is preferred on roadways if dry storage is available for stockpiling the material. The use of sand on roadways requires spring clean up along walks and roads and regular maintenance to clear catch basin sumps. If salt must be used on cement concrete walks, all new walks should be sealed within three days of installation to resist salt damage, using "Hydrozo Clear 30M" or equal.

The use of less damaging (though more expensive) snow melting chemicals such as calcium chloride pellets ("Ice Melt" or "Peladow," or equal) or calcium magnesium acetate ("Sno-N-Ice-Melt," or equal) should be considered on cement concrete walkways or where unit pavers are set on a concrete base. After ice and snow have melted, building maintenance staff should sweep walks and steps of buildings to remove chlorides and reduce tracking of residue into buildings. Walk-off mats should be placed at all building entries.

Recently, heated sidewalks were installed at the new Fisher College of Business. The long term benefits of this system should be evaluated relative to maintenance costs.

6. Temporary Landscapes
As the University acquires adjacent land parcels in the mixed use zones along some of the edges of campus, an approach toward treatment of these "temporary landscapes" should be taken which preserves the University’s future options for development and conveys a neighborliness toward the surrounding community. Where it is feasible to retain and use the existing structures, a scale and character of plantings and lawn that compliments the use of the structure is appropriate along with the provision for a suitable level of landscape maintenance. Where existing structures are demolished and the site is to be used as parking, playfields or lawn pending future development, more cost-effective, but attractive, treatments of the sites should be considered.

7. Vandalism Resistance
The campus landscape has suffered a great amount of damage on a variety of site elements from the continual abuse of roller-bladers and skateboarders. While a policy which prohibits this type of activity is in place, continual enforcement throughout all areas of campus is difficult. Therefore, careful design consideration should be given to site elements to minimize this type of abuse.

Another form of vandalism that can be discouraged with proper design of site elements is graffiti. The most common areas for this type of vandalism are on smooth concrete walls or bridge abutments. Creating a heavily textured surface on these walls will discourage vandals. In addition, a variety of concrete sealants are available which assist in the cleaning of concrete surfaces.

8. Site Lighting
The University has taken major strides toward the upgrade and installation of consistent, high quality, campus-wide site lighting. The historic-style "acorn" fixture for pedestrian walks complements the scale and context of the institution, particularly within the Academic Core. However, some areas appear to be too bright in contrast with adjacent spaces, and in some small spaces (such as the walkway west of Brown Hall) the poles are too closely spaced in such a small area. Industry standards for footcandle levels should not be the only criteria for light placement. A lighting designer should be retained to work with the University engineers to refine the Site Lighting Master Plan, in order to enhance feelings of safety and create a hierarchy of lighting spaces on the campus. The goals of a campus-wide site lighting system are

1. To convey a feeling of security after dark
2. To reinforce major pedestrian connectors
3. To highlight major spaces and building entries

To accomplish these goals, a number of factors must be considered in all lighting decisions:

9. Sign System
The quality and materials of the University’s signs convey volumes about the image of the institution. Over time, the types and numbers of signs have proliferated on the campus to meet changing needs. Installations are of uneven character and quality. At least two University departments are responsible for design and installation of temporary and permanent signs. 

A comprehensive sign study and design package should be undertaken to provide a sequence of information to campus visitors in a unified system. It is highly recommended that the University retain a qualified sign designer to develop this system. The sign system design package should address the ongoing design, management and maintenance of the sign system, sign placement, sign materials, and sign fabrication. In addition, the following issues should be considered relative to design and placement:

10. Bicycle Routes
As parking is relocated from the campus core into perimeter structure parking, it is likely that bicycle use within the campus will become even more popular. Policies established in Vol. II of the Campus Master Plan: Long Range Concept Plan suggest that pedestrian and bicycle routes are important types of campus transportation and should connect destination points within the campus, as well as key off-campus destinations. A comprehensive bicycle route plan for the campus should be developed, connecting districts of the campus, connecting regional bike paths and encouraging the use of campus streets, rather than pedestrian walks.

The successful long-term accommodation of bicycles within the campus will require that the design, education and management (enforcement) of a bicycle system be outlined in the comprehensive bicycle route plan and implemented by the University. This comprehensive plan should consider the following:

11. Tree Identification System
In support of the teaching, research and public service mission of the University, a campus-wide system of tree identification should be reinstated. The Chadwick Arboretum, along with the Horticulture and Landscape Architecture Departments, should use the comprehensive tree survey that is currently being developed by the University Department of Physical Facilities as a basis for the creation of a comprehensive tree identification walk. The following issues should be considered in the planning of the walk:

12. Art and Memorial Opportunities
Art enriches the environment and provides unstructured opportunities for learning. The incorporation of permanent art into the campus landscape is to be encouraged in locations where the art can be appropriately sited with quality materials, and where it can be appropriately maintained.

The zone of influence of each art piece extends beyond the actual artwork itself. The placement and site development for each piece should be carefully considered to integrate the entire composition into its surroundings. Many courtyards, pedestrian corridors, gateways and pedestrian intersections might provide opportunities for art placement. Some possible locations for art works are noted in Figure 4.2-1.

In addition to criteria established by the University Arts and Memorial Committee, art placement in the campus landscape should include consideration of: the sequence of discovery, degree of enclosure or openness, thematic association with campus history or adjacent academic disciplines, scale, light and shadow, and more practical issues such as required utilities, protection of existing walks and plant materials, and landscape restoration requirements.

Possible Interpretive Elements Related to the University’s Past
The University is enriched by the retention of historically interesting artifacts or landscapes of the past. For example, until the 1920’s the University Woods occupied the northeast quadrant of the central campus. Remnants of those woods remain in some of the larger specimen trees which flank College Drive, and west of Ramseyer Hall. These trees should be given high priority care and be retained into the next century. A small paved sitting area might be placed west of Ramseyer Hall commemorating the University Woods. The placement of walks and benches in this area should be designed to reduce the current compaction problems within the root zones of the trees and to improve the lawns. Irrigation may be required to maintain this area appropriately. 

The 40th parallel latitude marker, which now lies to the north of the Library, is an inadequate representation of this interesting theoretical line. A site art opportunity might illustrate the linear direction of this line throughout the campus. 

The ‘Five Brothers Memorial’ within The Oval was planted by the class of 1891. According to a University historical narrative of the 1970’s, "The Ringing Grooves of Change", only 5 of the original 7 elms remained at that time. Tissue culture replacement trees should be started from the remaining trees to allow the replanting of this memorial in the same location, along with an interpretive stone or label of the history of the planting. 

Buildings that are a critical part of the history of the University should also be identified. The "South Dorm" was the first residence hall on campus and later became a homeopathic hospital. This and many other historically significant buildings no longer exist, but their location should be noted in some way.

Other historically interesting artifacts of the University that should be considered as potential interpretive elements include, but are not limited to, the following:

Art Maintenance Issues
No art should be installed in the campus landscape without a maintenance plan that identifies each artwork’s maintenance requirements and the persons who will perform the maintenance, as well as assurance that funding is available for appropriate levels of maintenance. Temporary art installations may require a lesser investment in surrounding materials and maintenance, but design, maintenance and landscape restoration issues should be carefully considered in identifying appropriate locations and installations for temporary art. For example, if temporary banners were to be installed on site light poles or other campus structures, the installation plan would include plans for maintenance of the banners while on display, as well as their removal and restoration of any damaged lawns, paint touch-ups and other requirements.

Art Opportunities (image)

13. Campus Parking
The Campus Master Plan proposes that, over time, the majority of surface parking lots throughout campus will become building sites. The displacement of this parking will be accommodated in conveniently located structure parking. While this proposal will improve the functional and aesthetic qualities of the campus, the issue of surface parking will continue to exist for many years to come. A recently adopted Transportation and Parking Master Plan should be consulted regarding position, placement and allocation of parking. Guidelines for the treatment of surface parking and parking structures are as follows:

On Street Parking 
On-street parking on campus streets will be provided with an 8’-wide parallel-parking lane, where designated. Head in or angled parking should be minimized. While this parking arrangement yields more spaces, it also presents a safety risk with automobiles backing into the street with limited visibility. In addition, this arrangement creates a larger visual barrier to pedestrians crossing the street. The displacement of the spaces will be accounted for in convenient structure parking. Parallel parking spaces on campus streets should be reserved for disabled drivers, visitors to the University, and short term delivery and drop-off.

Surface Parking Lots
In order to reduce the negative visual and environmental impact of large surface parking areas, interior planting and perimeter screening should be established.

Parking Structures
Future parking structures, in addition to the number that currently exist, could dominate the visual landscape if not properly treated. The following guidelines will be used in the siting of new structures and the retrofitting of the existing structures.

14. Pedestrian and Vehicular Accessibility
The successful design of all campus spaces is dependent on providing safe access for all pedestrians. In addition, provisions for the campus area bus service, personal or campus vehicles for people with disabilities, emergency vehicles and service vehicles must always be part of any site improvement.

15. Public Safety
Recommendations toward improving public safety and security across campus are made throughout the Landscape Master Plan. In addition to the guidelines put forth regarding site lighting, parking and crosswalks, the following issues must also be considered in establishing a safe environment.

16. Site Furniture

Standards
A consistency in site furnishings will enhance the visual unity of all districts of the University. Standard benches, tables, trash receptacles, ash urns, bike racks, tree guards and kiosks have been selected for their durability, ease of maintenance and their styling. This furniture has been included in the Technical Appendix to this document. These selections represent the minimum quality standard. The classic simplicity of this furniture will adapt to almost every architectural context. A more contemporary bench alternative has also been selected for unique applications. This alternative will be used selectively and will be subject to the review of the Site Improvement Advisory Team. The standard color for all furniture will be black to compliment the standard light poles and fixtures. Once again, any deviation from the standard color will be reviewed by the Site Improvement Advisory Team for its appropriateness. The exception to the standard color will be the bike racks, which will be galvanized and unpainted. Painted bike racks require heavy maintenance to keep surfaces painted that have been chipped by bicycles and locks.

Placement Process
The location of site furniture throughout campus is the result of new building projects, site improvement projects or the request of University students, staff or faculty. The placement of all furniture will be subject to the review of the Site Improvement Advisory Team. All potential locations will be evaluated to ensure their maximum usage.

Pedestrian circulation patterns throughout campus are constantly changing with the creation of new buildings and site improvements. Therefore, placing furniture in the optimum locations is often difficult. Benches and trash receptacles will be placed in their proposed locations, but not fastened to the pavement. They will be observed in that location for one week to determine their usefulness. If the results are positive, the furniture will be fastened in place. If not, the furniture will be moved to an alternative location where it can be observed again. The following guidelines should be used in the placement of site furniture:

17. Paving Materials
In order to enhance the visual unity of the campus and simplify construction and maintenance techniques, a palette of standard paving materials has been established for different use areas. Standard details and specifications for these materials are part of the Technical Appendix of this master plan. The different types of use areas and their individual characteristics are as follows:

Sidewalks
All typical sidewalks throughout campus will be cast-in-place concrete. The minimum width will be six feet and will be built to support University maintenance vehicles. At all sidewalk intersections, a minimum radius of 6’ will be provided to minimize the compaction of lawn areas from corner cutting. In all areas where corner-cutting opportunities exist prior to the intersection, the desired lines for walking should be anticipated and a walk provided.

A few sidewalks will be treated with specialty pavement to reinforce their functional way-finding importance and/or their historical significance. These walks are discussed in more detail in the Sector Design Guidelines. They are the central campus promenade walks, the "Long Walk" of the Oval, and the restored Oval Drive.

Service Drives used as Pedestrian Sidewalks
In many areas, service access drives are used heavily by pedestrians. In all such cases, the space will accommodate the pedestrian as a first priority. To that end, the standard sidewalk material of cast-in-place concrete will be used as the paving surface. While the paving width and radii will accommodate specific service vehicles, score joints in the concrete will be scaled and patterned to reinforce the pedestrian qualities of the space. 

Building Entries and Courtyards
Paving areas at the entrances to buildings and inside of enclosed courtyards represent opportunities to introduce specialty paving into the campus landscape. These materials should be creatively used to complement the architecture and possibly reflect the history or academic mission of that specific building or collection of buildings. The layout of these specialty areas will be reviewed by the University Landscape Architect as to its appropriateness relative to the existing architecture and adjacent outdoor spaces.

Crosswalks
Numerous conflicts exist between pedestrians, bicyclists and automobiles on this urban campus. A more clear delineation of crosswalks is needed to create a safer environment for the entire campus population. Through the use of specialty brick pavement, both vehicles and pedestrians will be alerted to the intersection. These brick paved crosswalks will be contained by 12"-wide cast-in-place concrete bands. The width of these crosswalks will be determined by the width of the approaching concrete sidewalks. Crosswalks will be located where all major pedestrian routes intersect vehicular streets. Safe viewing angles, free of visual obstructions, must be maintained at all crossings. Traffic signage and signals should be installed as necessary.

Streets, Parking Lots and Service Courts
Vehicular streets, parking lots and service courts that are not used as pedestrian throughways will receive asphalt paving. This pavement type will provide sufficient durability with minimal maintenance. Asphalt will also be cost effective, based on the large quantity that is often required. Heavy-duty reinforced concrete will be required in some service court areas where heavy vehicular loads are expected.

Bike Paths
Paths intended exclusively for the use of biking and other active pursuits such as jogging and roller-blading will be constructed of asphalt paving. This pavement type will provide the most flexible and cost effective solution for these long path systems. These paths will typically have a width of 10’-12’ to accommodate the variety of users.

18. Street Tree Placement
Throughout the Design Guidelines for the Sectors of the Study Area (Section 4.3), the spacing of street trees is proposed at 30’ on center to 40’ on center depending on the given street. While it is the intention of this spacing requirement to create the appropriate rhythm and scale for the individual street, it should be understood that this is a guide for planting, and deviation from this spacing will be acceptable under certain conditions. Adjustment will often be necessary to avoid utilities, building entries, intersecting paths and view obstructions at intersections.

Street trees will typically be placed behind the sidewalk, which is integral with the curb throughout most of the urban streets of campus. This will maximize the root zone for these trees in these areas of minimal distance from building face to building face. In urban areas, where the cross section of the street corridor is more generous, a more traditional street tree placement will be utilized with a generous tree lawn between the back of curb and the sidewalk. This approach should be considered if any of the following situations apply:

When this approach is used, the width of the tree lawn will be maximized to provide the best growing conditions for the tree. Special non-compactible soil mix, regular aeration and irrigation should also be considered for this type of street tree placement. In areas where excessive foot traffic is expected across the tree lawn, unit pavers can be installed in place of lawn.

19. Fencing, Screen Walls and Pedestrian Control
The proliferation of chain link fence across campus has occurred in order to satisfy many issues, including construction barriers, athletic fences and pedestrian control devices. While this type of fencing is both functional and cost effective, it detracts from the visual quality of the campus and the image of the University.

Great measures have also been taken to further control pedestrian movement with residential scale plant material and bollards with attached chains. These types of pedestrian control devices are unsightly and should be eliminated. The proper location of walkways with adequate radii at the intersections will minimize lawn damage. Occasional reseeding at major pedestrian walkways and intersections should be expected and be part of regular maintenance operations.

In order to enhance the visual quality of the campus, vertical elements that are used for fencing, screening or controlling pedestrians will be categorized and standardized to the same extent as pavement and site furniture. The standard details for these vertical elements are found in the Technical Appendix to this Landscape Master Plan.

Chain-Link Fencing
Chain-link fencing will only be used to enclose tennis and basketball courts, and for outfield fencing and backstops. All chain-link fences will be vinyl-coated in a dark color. The height of these fences will be the minimum required by the particular activity.

Ornamental Fencing
An ornamental iron fence will be utilized in areas where permanent pedestrian control is required and where building edges need to be reinforced. This may include the containment of recreational fields, the establishment of the campus edge along some public street frontages and the sense of enclosure to some courtyard spaces.

Construction Fencing
The various building and site improvements, which occur across the campus, create the perception of a place that is continually under repair or construction. Currently, construction sites are typically isolated from pedestrians with chain link fencing. While this provides for pedestrian safety, it fails to visually screen the day to day construction activities from the campus community. A wood fence will provide both a physical and visual separation for the campus community and its visitors. Graphics will be permitted on these wood fences to inform the community of the proposed improvements and the consultants and contractors involved. Creativity should be encouraged in the graphic presentation of the project information.

Screen Walls
Building mechanical equipment, loading docks or any other unsightly utilitarian site elements require a consistent screening treatment. Masonry screen walls will be the preferred method of screening. The material for these walls will match the adjacent architecture. Evergreen plant material may also be used to screen these functions.

20. Priority Landscapes
While it is the intent of this Landscape Master Plan to enhance the quality of all outdoor spaces on campus, some spaces are deserving of special attention due to their unique characteristics, their historical significance, and/or their importance to the image of the University. These spaces represent the identity of the institution and, as such, will be treated with the highest level of care and maintenance. While the importance of these priority landscapes is described below, specific guidelines are discussed in the Sector Design Guidelines (Section 4.3).

The Oval
The Oval is the sacred heart of the University. Its open lawn and mature tree canopy are framed by the University’s most historic architecture. Its central location makes it a popular space for individual and group activities.

Mirror Lake Hollow
One of the few places of the Central Campus where traces of the original landform are still evident is at Mirror Lake Hollow. A gentle swale begins at the Ohio Union and terminates to the west at Mirror Lake. Collectively, the rolling land, the mature tree canopy, Mirror Lake and the historic Browning Amphitheatre represent the unique and picturesque landscape of the University and should be preserved as they exist today with some selected improvements.

High Street Lawn
The large setback of open lawn along the east side of High Street appropriately presents the institutional and collegiate character of the University to the masses of people that are introduced to the campus as they travel along High Street.

Olentangy River Corridor
The Olentangy River is the most significant natural feature on the campus. For many years it has been viewed as an obstacle between central campus and parts west. Future pedestrian connections and public access identified by the Campus Master Plan and the City of Columbus Riverfront Planning Study will turn the river into a major pedestrian spine which will unify the campus and the greater community.

Recreational Fields
The Larkins Recreational Fields and the Midwest Recreational Fields represent the most intensely used Green Reserve spaces on campus. As future building expansion and site improvements continue in the vicinity of these fields, the area left for play will be reduced. The reduction in space limits the ability to modify field layout and minimize the wear on the fields. These fields should be upgraded and maintained at a high level to ensure their use and durability in the future.

The Urban Forest
The tree canopy of the campus is critical to the University image. Its stately and mature qualities reflect the long heritage of the place and complement the institutionally-scaled architecture. The health of this urban forest must always be a high priority.

Future Priorities
As future improvements occur as a result of the Campus Master Plan and the Landscape Master Plan, some new spaces will potentially become high priority landscapes. The Lane Avenue Parkway from State Route 315 to the Olentangy River will be the most heavily used entrance to the University and, consequently, the most visible. The conversion of the Stadium parking lot to the Stadium Green will establish the fore lawn to the most recognizable piece of University architecture: Ohio Stadium. Lastly, the River of Trees will provide the critical green space connection from Mirror Lake Hollow to the Olentangy River and, in so doing, create a unique expression of landscape as art.

4.3 Design Guidelines for Sectors of the Study Area
The following design guidelines are intended as more detailed overlays to the sectors identified in section 4.3 of the District Plan for the Academic Core North (Volume III of the Campus Master Plan). In addition to these eighteen sectors are the North Residence Halls, the South Residence Halls and the Campus Edges. The locations of these individual sectors are found in figure 4.3-1. Images of the Vision Plan, street cross-sections and character sketches are found throughout this section to graphically support the design guidelines.

Study Area Sectors. (image)

1. High Street
High Street is the historic "front door" to the University. University buildings are typically set back a generous 150’ from the sidewalk, with broad open lawn and informally planted high canopy trees creating a gracious, institutional edge to the Campus. This edge is particularly striking because of the contrast with the surrounding city land use, which is primarily densely developed and aging commercial and multi-family residential. Plans are currently underway by Campus Partners to upgrade the east side of High Street, including sidewalk, signage, storefront and lighting improvements. Coordination between the University and Campus Partners is critical to maintaining this contrast of the urban edge on the east and the collegiate edge on the west, while also unifying the pedestrian crossing system.

Over time, the integrity of the University’s historical green lawn along High Street has been interrupted by the addition of various hardscape materials for walkways, raised planters, vehicular access, parking and service areas. Lighting is primarily from cobra-head city fixtures in the middle of the 12’ wide sidewalk. 

Large setbacks exist along the College Road side of many of these buildings as well. This creates an island of green space around these institutional buildings. These buildings should be unified by consistently treating the landscape that surrounds them. This will be accomplished through a consistent use of materials including plantings, paving, furniture and light fixtures.

While it is important to maintain a consistent character on all sides of these High Street buildings, the High Street frontage will receive highest priority. The high visibility of this public edge requires that a strict building setback be obeyed and that the tree canopy and lawns be maintained at the highest level. The west building faces of College Road receive more pedestrian use and have a more irregular setback. Future buildings and/or expansions may affect this setback, but the park-like character of this edge should be preserved as much as possible.


High Street – Lane Avenue to West 17th Avenue.

Design Guidelines


High Street at Ramseyer Hall Looking North.


High Street at Curl Drive Looking North.


High Street – The Wexner Center Block.


Wexner Center service drive treatment along high street.


The 15th Avenue Gateway.


High Street – Ohio Union Parking Garage to West 11th Avenue.


2. Lane Avenue
Traveling Lane Avenue by automobile, bicycle, or on foot allows students, staff and visitors to experience the great diversity of environments at The Ohio State University. It is the intent of these guidelines to preserve and enhance the rich diversity of "the prairie", the "river corridor", and the "urban campus" which are identified by the Long Range Concept Plan.

Lane Avenue - West of State Route 315
As one approaches from the west, the first introduction to the University occurs just east of North Star Road as land uses change from commercial strip retail to open field. This far west area of campus has historically been used by the College of Food, Agricultural and Environmental Sciences for research and education. The Waterman Agricultural and Natural Resources Laboratory along the north side is part of the Green Reserve and will be preserved indefinitely for further research and educational pursuits. The new recreational park along the south side of Lane Avenue will also be maintained as part of the Green Reserve. These two open green spaces are critical to the preservation of the character of this historic prairie landscape. The location of this segment of Lane Avenue, between two spaces of the Green Reserve, establishes it as a parkway as defined under spatial hierarchies. 


Lane Avenue ­ Looking West at Waterman Agricultural & Natural Resources Laboratory.

Design Guidelines


Lane Avenue State - Route 315 to the Olentangy River.

Lane Avenue - State Route 315 to the Olentangy River
The State Route 315/Lane Avenue Interchange serves as the primary access point to the University for students, staff, faculty and visitors approaching from the north and south. In addition, it acts as an internal campus threshold as people move east along Lane Avenue toward the river. With such high visibility, the zone between the interchange and the river will become an entry parkway that celebrates the arrival at the University. The landscape of this zone will maintain a pastoral character, yet become more ordered than the parkway to the west, and be maintained at a higher level. A variety of buildings with different uses exists in
this zone with particular emphasis on the Schottenstein Center, which dominates in scale and attracts the greatest number of visitors.


Lane Avenue Parkway ­ Looking East from Fyffe Road.

Design Guidelines

Lane Avenue - Olentangy River to High Street
The existing Lane Avenue bridge is scheduled to be replaced by a wider, more pedestrian friendly, suspension bridge. The design of this bridge will enhance the sense of threshold between the pastoral landscape to the west and the urban landscape to the east. Large columns will support the structure in the center and act as a gateway into the urban campus. 


Lane Avenue - Olentangy River to High Street.

Design Guidelines


Lane Avenue - Looking West at St. John Arena.

Campus Gateways. (image)

3. Campus Entries and Gateways
There are many points of entry into The Ohio State University campus from all of its adjacent neighborhoods. At every point where visitors, staff, faculty and students enter campus, the landscape should introduce the University as a special institutional place. Each entry has its own unique context relative to streets, greenspace and structures. Therefore, each point of entry should be considered individually while still part of an overall campus system of entries.

This master plan identifies sixteen gateways into the campus. All of these gateways can be categorized into one of the following five types of entry treatments: Architectural Entries, Historic Entries, Green Entries Rural Entries and Science and Technology Entries. In addition, the Entry Parkway is a sixth type of entry experience with unique functional and spatial qualities.

A typical gateway treatment currently exists at Tuttle Park Place and Lane Avenue, Woodruff Avenue and High Street, 12th Avenue and High Street and King Avenue and Cannon Drive. It consists of masonry stone walls, pre-cast concrete seats, concrete pavers and residential scale plantings. The composition and materials of these gateways are residential in scale and do not reflect the stately qualities of the University. These gateways should be removed at such time that replacement gateways could be implemented.

Architectural Entries
These entries will be articulated through the use of existing or proposed buildings. Building masses will address their respective intersections and channel vehicles and pedestrians into the campus. Plaza spaces at these architectural entries will become points of gathering for those waiting to cross the street as well as for those entering the buildings. Two architectural entries will exist at Lane Avenue and Tuttle Park Place, and at Lane Avenue and Neil Avenue. Brick sidewalks bordered by concrete bands will help define pedestrian movement and enhance the sense of gateway at both of these busy intersections. At the Lane Avenue and Tuttle Park Place intersection a pedestrian scale sign will introduce "The Ohio State University". The sign will be placed on the southwest corner of the intersection and perpendicular to Lane Avenue to provide maximum visibility. The sign should be set cleanly in the plaza as part of a masonry wall, planter and/or a monoculture of low plantings. The elegant simplicity of the sign should reflect the stately institution that it represents. Residential scale, high maintenance plantings will be avoided.


The historic gateway columns at 15th Avenue and High Street.

Historic Entries
Two historic entry features exist that should be preserved. The gateway columns at 15th Avenue represent the major historic gateway to campus and should be preserved as part of the re-designed 15th Avenue Gateway Plaza. A smaller set of entry columns exists at the intersection of 11th Avenue and Neil Avenue. While University buildings exist further to the south along Neil Avenue, this intersection represents the point at which visitors become enveloped by the Campus. Attempts to mimic these columns in other places on campus should be discouraged in order to avoid diluting the significance of these historical markers. Brick crosswalks bordered by concrete bands will help define pedestrian movement and enhance the sense of gateway at both of these intersections. The display of banners, graphics and advertisements from these columns should be prohibited.


A green entry at west 11th and High Street.

Green Entries
A number of entry points exist which present the campus in a subtle yet very institutional manner. Those areas where a vehicle or pedestrian experiences a sharp transition from a very urban environment to the green collegiate lawn should be enhanced. This should be achieved by creating open views to well maintained, irrigated lawns with high canopy shade trees. These lawns will be the front yards to the University buildings beyond. The following are examples of Green Entries: Lane Avenue and High Street, Woodruff Avenue and High Street, 12th Avenue and High Street, 11th Avenue and High Street, John Herrick Drive and Olentangy River Road, Cannon Drive and King Avenue and Ackerman Road and Olentangy River Road. 

With the announcement of the University being made primarily with the contrast of the collegiate lawn to the urban context, additional articulation will be simple and understated. Brick sidewalks bordered by concrete bands will help define pedestrian movement and enhance the sense of gateway at all of these busy intersections. Vehicular scale signs will be placed in the open lawn areas. These signs will not be decorated with residential scale, high maintenance plants, but rather set cleanly in the lawn area. They will be mounted in a flush concrete pad that will allow maintenance crews to easily maintain the lawn around them. A single sign at Lane Avenue and High Street will be mounted on the southwest corner and oriented toward the intersection. A single sign face will also be oriented toward the intersection of 11th Avenue and High Street from the northwest corner. Double sign faces at Woodruff Avenue and at 12th Avenue will be placed on the northwest corners and perpendicular to High Street to maximize visibility to those traveling north or south on High Street. At John Herrick Drive and Olentangy River Road a single sign face will occupy the northwest corner and be oriented toward the intersection. At Ackerman Road and Olentangy River Road a single sign face will be oriented toward the intersection from the southwest corner. At Cannon Drive and King Avenue, a double sign face will be perpendicular to King Avenue on the northwest corner. This will provide maximum visibility to those traveling east or west on King Avenue.


A rural entry into Campus along Lane Avenue east of North Star Road.

Rural Entries 
Rural Entries are very similar to the Green Entries in that they also announce the University with a setback of open lawn. These lawns however, are part of the rural theme of West Campus. Areas west of State Route 315 will not be maintained at the same high level as the collegiate lawns of Central Campus. These entries will be at Lane Avenue, east of the existing bowling alley, as well as at the intersection of Ackerman Road and Kenny Road. Signage will be treated with the same simplicity as the Green Entries. At Lane Avenue just east of the existing bowling alley a single sign panel will be placed along the south side, and perpendicular to Lane Avenue. A single sign panel will be oriented toward the intersection of Ackerman Road and Kenny Road from the southeast corner. 

Science and Technology Entries
Entries to the Science and Technology Campus will be treated as rural entries but differentiate themselves through the articulation of the entry sign. The character of these signs should communicate the cutting edge research mission of this area of campus by blending the prairie aesthetic with the high-tech appearance of it’s facilities. This type of treatment should be implemented at the northeast, northwest and southwest corners of the Kinnear Road and Kenny Road intersection and at the northeast and southeast corners of the intersection of North Star Road and Kinnear Road. 

Entry Parkway
One campus entry experience is unique as a result of its spatial qualities, location and function. The segment of Lane Avenue Parkway from the State Route 315 interchange to the Lane Avenue Bridge serves as the primary vehicular access into campus. This linear parkway space will celebrate the arrival at the University by creating a transition from the pastoral landscape to the urban landscape. A formal rhythm of street trees, light fixtures and banners marching through a bucolic landscape of open lawn, gently curving walks and informal trees will lead to a gateway to the urban campus at the Lane Avenue Bridge. Refer to the Lane Avenue sector for design guidelines.
 

4. Woodruff Avenue/Woody Hayes Drive
Woodruff Avenue/Woody Hayes Drive is the most critical internal vehicular and pedestrian linkage from Central Campus to Midwest Campus and on to West Campus. As previous master planning efforts predict, future development to the west will increase the numbers of people moving east and west along this corridor.


Woody Hayes Drive ­ State Route 315 to Tuttle Park Place.

As people move along this corridor, four distinct spaces will be experienced as a result of building placement and landscape treatment. Starting at Kenny Road, one will travel east along Woody Hayes Drive, an urban boulevard, between the urban edges of the Midwest Campus buildings. This creates a contrast to the open experience of the river corridor. This is followed by the monumental event of the Stadium Green and finally the arrival at the urban street which is Woodruff Avenue.

Design Guidelines


Woody Hayes Drive Looking West at Midwest Campus.


Woodruff Avenue ­ Tuttle Park Place to High Street. (full size)


Woodruff Avenue Looking West.

5. 17th Avenue Pedestrian Connection to West Campus
One of the most critical factors in strengthening the connection between Central Campus and the Midwest Campus is the creation of the 17th Avenue Pedestrian Connection. It will begin at Larkins Hall, pass by the south end of Ohio Stadium, cross the Olentangy River and end at Midwest Campus.


17th Avenue Pedestrian Connector. (full size)

Design Guidelines

6. Neil Avenue
Historically, Neil Avenue was a major vehicular and pedestrian connection to central campus from residential communities to the north and south. As the University has evolved, vehicular patterns have changed throughout the campus. The result is a series of disjointed segments along Neil Avenue that are either restricted to pedestrians, restricted to authorized vehicles, or open to all vehicles and pedestrians. The aesthetic quality of these segments is equally disjointed as one passes from an urban streetscape to a pedestrian mall and back again to another streetscape which is treated differently than the first. Regardless of the vehicular and pedestrian uses of each segment of Neil Avenue, attempts should be made to restore a consistent street character for Neil Avenue from Lane Avenue on the north to 11th Avenue on the south.


Neil Avenue. (full size)

Design Guidelines


Neil Avenue Looking North Between West Frambes Avenue & Woodruff Avenue.


Neil Avenue Looking North Between 18th Avenue & 17th Avenue.

7. The Oval
The Oval is the major gathering space for the University community and represents the heart of the campus to most members of the community and to visitors. Restoration of The Oval should be a high landscape priority for the University. Over time, the historic oval perimeter drive has been closed to most traffic, walkways have been added, views and access have been cut off from High Street, and earth mounds, street furniture and plantings of various types have been added in an attempt to control and direct pedestrian traffic. 


The oval.

Design Guidelines


North Oval Drive West Toward Darby Hall.


South Oval Drive Looking East Toward Orton Hall.

8. Mirror Lake Hollow
The east end of the Hollow is a broad swale of open lawn and mature tree canopy. This major campus open space links the South Dorms to the center of campus and provides a handsome setting for the Ohio Union. 

Design Guidelines


Mirror Lake Hollow. 

Mirror Lake is treasured as a unique place to discover on the Campus. An overall restoration plan for this area should be developed to enrich the plant palette, stabilize the highly erodible slopes, preserve the play of light and shadow and reinforce the enclosed space.

Design Guidelines

9. Olentangy River Corridor
Historically, the Olentangy River has been considered an edge of the central campus and a barrier to areas west. As Midwest and West Campus continue to develop and attempts are made to strengthen the physical and visual connections to central campus, this amenity will become the unifying greenway spine of the University. The preservation of the various spaces of the Green Reserve and the strengthening of cross campus connections will tie all areas of campus to the river corridor. Additionally, the enhancement of the River Corridor to the north and the south will provide a stronger linkage to the greater community.


The Olentangy River Corridor from
Lane Avenue to John Herrick Drive.

Design Guidelines

10. Stadium Green
The Stadium Green will gradually be created as replacement structure parking becomes available. This green will not only enhance the presence of the Stadium, but moreover, will strengthen the connection from the central campus to the river. The green will serve many purposes, including informal recreation, band practices and vehicle parking, and tailgating on game days.

Design Guidelines


The Stadium Green.

11. Larkins Recreational Fields & River of Trees 
The Recreational Fields west of Larkins Hall currently create an obstacle between the urban central campus and the river. While paths exist along the north edge, through the center and along the south edge, they do not provide a pleasant pedestrian experience. Chain-link fences around tennis courts and recreational fields add physical barriers and visual clutter to the space. Enhancements to these pedestrian control devices and the articulation of the pedestrian connectors will strengthen the central campus ties to places west. The River of Trees will form the south edge of the space and provide a unique pedestrian connection from south campus to the river.


The River of Trees and Larkins Recreational Fields. (full size)
 

Recreational Fields
As part of the Green Reserve, the Recreational Fields will be preserved as an active open green space indefinitely. As future building expansions and site improvements continue in the vicinity of the fields, the area left for play will be reduced. As this occurs, the quality of the fields should be improved to maximize their durability. To enhance the visual qualities of this space, special consideration will be given to defining its edges while strengthening pedestrian circulation around the space.

Design Guidelines

The River of Trees
The River of Trees will physically link the south portion of Central Campus to the river corridor. Symbolically, the River of Trees connects Mirror Lake to the Olentangy River, creating a metaphor for the waterway, which once connected these two bodies of water.

Design Guidelines

12. Midwest Campus Recreational Fields
The Midwest Campus Recreational Fields, also known as the Coffey Road Recreational Fields, are bounded by Woody Hayes Drive, future buildings along the east edge of Coffey Road, the extension of Vernon Tharp Street to Olentangy River Road, and Olentangy River Road. These boundaries limit the number of softball fields to three as opposed to four, which was originally proposed in the Campus Master Plan. This recreation area represents one of three major green spaces on Midwest Campus. While the other two, the Howlett Hall Quadrangle and the Veterinary Quadrangle, are enclosed by building masses, the Recreational Fields are open on the east to the Olentangy River. With the future addition of more buildings along the east edge of Coffey Road and throughout Midwest Campus, this green space will increasingly become an important transition from the urban campus to the bucolic river edge. As field area decreases due to new construction along the west edge, it will become important for these fields to be of the highest quality possible to maximize durability.

Design Guidelines


Midwest Campus Recreational Fields.

13. North Campus 
The North Campus area is an urban assemblage of buildings, streets and alleys, which is bounded by Woodruff Avenue, College Road, West 17th Avenue and Neil Avenue. The evolution of building masses in this area has created an urban density, but has not provided for clear north/south pedestrian movement. Site improvements have also been inconsistent and have failed to unify circulation routes and other pedestrian spaces. A number of improvements need to be made to bring organization to this area of Campus and enhance its urban qualities.


North Campus.

Design Guidelines

Streetscapes
Existing and former urban streets throughout campus will be recreated or enhanced to reestablish their urban streetscape qualities. West 17th, 18th and 19th Avenues of North Campus are three such streets. Through proper design, these streets will accommodate all forms of vehicular circulation while placing special emphasis on pedestrians. For other streetscapes in the North Campus areas see the Neil Avenue and Woodruff Avenue sector design guidelines. See High Street sector for the treatment of West 17th Avenue and West 18th Avenue, east of College Road.

The following design guidelines recommend a distinct change in street profile from that suggested in Volume III of the Campus Master Plan: District Plan for the Academic Core North. Street trees that were proposed to be placed in 6’- wide planters behind the curb have been relocated behind an integral concrete curb and walk. This will maximize the amount of space for the tree to establish a healthy root zone between the walk and the building face. Guidelines for the selection of tree types for individual streets are found in the Urban Forest Recommendations.

West 17th Avenue


West 17th Avenue Looking West ­ East of Neil Avenue.

West 18th Avenue


West 18th Avenue Looking West.

West 19th Avenue


West 19th Avenue Looking West.


West 19th Avenue Looking East.

The North Green
While West 17th, 18th and 19th Avenues provide direct east/west circulation through North Campus, the north/south circulation routes are less clearly defined. With the large amount of pedestrian traffic generated by residential areas to the north, a clear north/south connector though North Campus to the Oval is critical. The existing Denney Hall Green will become the major north/south pedestrian connector from Lane Avenue through the North Residence Halls and through the North Academic Core. The existing Denney Green extends to the north between Smith and McPherson Laboratories and is closed at the north end by Haskett Hall. The North Green will be created with the eventual removal of Haskett Hall. When Scott House reaches the end of its useful life, it too will be removed to further extend the North Green to its terminus at Drackett Tower. While not as critical to the creation of this space, Denney Hall might be considered for removal at the end of its useful life in order to terminate the Green with the more historic Derby Hall.


The North Green Looking South to Denney Hall.

Urban Courtyards, Pedestrian Alleys, Service Courts and Building Plates
The remainder of spaces in the North Campus area can be categorized as Urban Courtyards, Pedestrian Alleys, Service Courts and Building Plates. These spaces are shown in Figure 3.3-1. Existing and proposed Urban Courtyards include the MacQuigg Lab Entry Courtyard, the courtyard east of the future Physical Sciences Building, the Neil and Faye Smith Park (to be modified with the Robinson Lab replacement project), the Celeste Lab Courtyard, the Math Tower/Brown Hall Courtyard (following the removal of the north wing of Brown Hall) and the future Stillman Hall Courtyard. Pedestrian alleys include the corridor between Bolz Hall and the future Physical Sciences Building, the corridors along the east and west sides of the Robinson Laboratory replacement building, and the corridor between Celeste Lab and McPherson Laboratory. Service Courts are isolated behind Hitchcock Hall, behind the Mathematics Building and west of Evans Laboratory, south of West 19th Avenue. Building Plates are the remainder of the spaces that appear as the front, rear or side yards to individual buildings.

Section 3.3: Spatial Hierarchies and Organization, articulates the definition and guidelines for these types of spaces. The consistent treatment of these spatial types will functionally and visually unify this part of campus and enhance its urban qualities.

14. Tuttle Park/Millikin Block
The edges of the Tuttle Park/Millikin Block are defined by Woodruff Avenue, Tuttle Park Place, West 17th Avenue and Neil Avenue. This block has historically served a number of utilitarian functions with the McCracken Power Plant and a number of other maintenance related buildings. Improvements to the College of Business and the St. John Arena Block will transform Tuttle Park Place into a major University gateway. This will, in turn, channel a large number of pedestrians through the center of the Millikin Block. Future improvements to the Stadium Green will increase the flow of pedestrians from North Campus, through the Millikin Block, and on to the Stadium and the river.


The Tuttle Park/Millikin Block.

Design Guidelines

15. The Larkins/Neil Block
The Campus Master Plan recommends a number of improvements to this district of campus, which is bounded by West 17th Avenue, The Recreation Fields, Neil Avenue, and the River of Trees. Future buildings and site improvement will replace the large parking lot which currently separates Mirror Lake and The Oval from the Recreation Fields. As this district becomes more urbanized, major circulation routes will be created or enhanced and urban courtyards will be created by new building configurations.

Design Guidelines


The Larkins/Neil Block.

16. St. John Arena Block
As the St. John Arena Block develops over time, new structures will be located at the corners of the block to define the street edges. While these buildings will improve the street aesthetics, their massive size may create a perceived barrier unless major north/south connections from Lane Avenue to Woody Hayes Drive are strengthened.


The St. John arena Block.

Design Guidelines

17. Lane/Tuttle Park Gateway Block
This block is bounded by Lane Avenue, Tuttle Park Place, West Frambes Avenue and Neil Avenue. The Campus Master Plan recommends the replacement of the existing parking lot and Jesse Owens Recreation Center with an academic building, or use that requires high visibility on the west end, and a parking garage and/or new recreation facility on the east end. With vehicular streets on all four sides of this block and the potential addition of structured parking, the delineation of direct, safe pedestrian routes is critical in this district.


Lane/Tuttle Park Gateway Block.

Design Guidelines

18. Midwest Campus
The Campus Master Plan proposes that future development in the Midwest Campus will attempt to create a stronger physical and visual connection to the Central Campus. This will be accomplished through improved east/west pedestrian connections and by creating building masses which are more urban in their relationship to other buildings and the street. The spaces that will be created by these future buildings must respond to this urban character as well.

Improvements to the north of the Midwest Campus require that special attention be given to the north/south vehicular and pedestrian connections. Recent athletic facility improvements, including the Schottenstein Center, along with future improvements to Chadwick Arboretum, will generate a much larger volume of people moving north and south along urban streetscapes and pedestrian alleys.


Midwest Campus.

Design Guidelines

19. North Residence Halls
The North Residence Halls sector is bounded by Lane Avenue, Neil Avenue, Woodruff Avenue and High Street. It currently consists of residence halls, dining halls and recreation uses. The haphazard development of this district over time has created a number of outdoor spaces that lack spatial definition. Circulation is roughly organized on a grid; however, connections are often interrupted by buildings or service areas. Improving spatial hierarchy and circulation throughout this district will create a better living environment for students while strengthening the connections to the Academic Core of campus.

Design Guidelines


North Residence Halls.

20. South Residence Halls
Some of the most underutilized outdoor spaces on Campus are found in the South Residence Halls District. Parking and service courts predominate in areas that could become memorable outdoor spaces. This residential district currently lacks an open green space as well as any quality outdoor study areas.


The South Residence Halls.

Design Guidelines


Mack Hall Resident Courtyard.

21. Campus Edges
The purpose of exploring the roadway edge treatments for the far north and west areas of campus is to provide continuity and identity for both the University as a whole and for each district. The specific districts included are Waterman Agricultural and Natural Resources Laboratory (referred to in previous Master Plans as Waterman Farm), West Campus, Olentangy Plain and the 315 Corridor. Design guidelines and illustrative sections are provided for each district to define the edge treatments.

Waterman Agricultural and Natural Resources Laboratories
Waterman Agricultural and Natural Resources Laboratory located north of Lane Avenue, west of Kenny Road and east of North Star Road, symbolizes the history of Ohio State as a land grant University. The existing conditions of the site include a variety of landscapes: open fields and pastures, orchards, a dense wood lot, windrows and facilities used for instruction and intensive research. The edge treatments along this district seek to celebrate the rural landscape and provide open views into the site, while instilling an institutional character.

Design Guidelines


Typical Waterman Agricultural and Natural Resources Laboratory Edge Treatment.
 

West Campus
The West Campus district edges are defined by Lane Avenue to the north, Kenny Road to the east, Kinnear Road to the south and North Star Road to the west. The majority of this district is open, undeveloped land with the exception of some development along Kenny and Kinnear Roads and the new recreational park along Lane Avenue. Long range plans call for this area to develop into science and research facilities of a rather high urban density. The preservation of the edges as rural buffers further enhances the land grant heritage of the University, while providing a dynamic contrast with the future science and research facilities.


Typical West Campus Edge Treatment.

Design Guidelines


Kinnear Road Looking West.

Olentangy Plain
The Olentangy Plain is bound by Lane Avenue, Olentangy River Road, Ackerman Road and State Route 315. The land use in this area is predominately athletics, including several major athletic facilities. Another large portion of the district is dedicated to Chadwick Arboretum. The edge along Ackerman Road is developed sparsely with residential buildings and the childcare center. Future plans show that the northern portion of the district along Ackerman will be developed with future campus buildings and residences. For the purpose of defining the edge conditions, only Ackerman Road and Olentangy River Road will be explored. See the Lane Avenue sector and the State Route 315 edge treatment for guidelines on these edges.

Design Guidelines


Typical Olentangy Plain Edge Treatment.

State Route 315 Corridor
The State Route 315 corridor serves as a major corridor for visitors and users of the University as well as the City of Columbus as a whole. The corridor provides the motorist with views of the western portion of the campus and has the opportunity to frame long views to the landmarks of the central campus.

Design Guidelines


Typical State Route 315 Edge Treatment